Saudi fighter jets help US in anti-al-Qaeda drone war in Yemen – report


 

Predator drone (Reuters / Handout)

Predator drone (Reuters / Handout)

Saudi Arabia has assisted the US in its “secret war” against Al-Qaeda members in Yemen, an English newspaper reports. The Times claims the Saudi Air Force provided fighter jets for so-called drone missions in the Arabian Peninsula.

­“Some of the so-called drone missions are actually Saudi Air Force missions,” the newspaper cited a US intelligence official, whose name was not given in the report.

The Times claims that 228 people were killed by covert attacks last year in Yemen, the home of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

The disclosure may now stir more criticism against US activity in Yemen as well as provoke questions about the lawfulness of America’s covert drone campaign against Al-Qaeda.

The US escalated drone strikes in the region under a policy, requested by CIA and adopted by the Obama Administration in April. The so-called “signature strikes” eventually allows launching strikes against terrorist targets even if the identities of the suspects are unknown.

The newspaper states that Washington considers the stealthy area war in Yemen, personally overseen by the President Obama, “is a new model for US intervention abroad”.

It also points out that the legal problems triggered by the capture and further detention of enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay, has “become so onerous that the Pentagon has recast its orders.”

“There is no kill or capture anymore. It’s kill or kill,” a US official told The Times.

In the meantime, a recent report by the Washington-based think tank New America Foundation showed the number of American airstrikes in Yemen, largely carried out by unmanned drones, has tripled in frequency in comparison with 2011 and for the first time outnumbered such strikes in Pakistan.

But in contrast to those in Pakistan, drone strikes in Yemen take place with the government’s permission.

Yemen’s president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who took power last February in the wake of an uprising against former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, publically welcomed US strikes, praising them as key tool in the battle against Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Unlike his predecessor, who denied the fact of US drone strikes in the country, Hadi stresses that he personally authorizes every attack.

Even if Yemen’s new president has backed them, American drone strikes remain deeply controversial and are not popular among the Yemeni people.

Despite the increase in drone strikes, the group’s core leadership has survived. Critics point to cases of innocent civilian casualties which have become more frequent as well as drone attacks under the “signature strikes” policy.

While US the claims the number of innocent victims has been minimal, independent studies prove the opposite.

Since the adoption of the expanded policy, the US has targeted buildings, vehicles and people relying on so-called activity patterns from satellites and insiders.

Since these drone attacks are done without public oversight, it makes it impossible to know the actual number of civilian casualties.

According to data from the Long War Journal, at least 35 civilians have been killed in the attacks in the last 12 months.

Moreover, the US does not have to disclose information about civilian casualties even when it’s American citizens being killed abroad.

On Wednesday a federal judge ruled the US Justice Department does not have a legal obligation to explain the rationale behind killing Americans with targeted drone strikes.

Since 2009 bombings by remote-controlled US drones in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia have tripled, bringing the number to 300, Reuters reports. For comparison, during the entire Bush administration, there were just 51.

 

Is U.S. Planning a Revenge Attack on Pakistan?


The U.S. 10 year alliance with Pakistan is a question of trust now.

The relation between U.S., Pakistan is facing an uncertain future and many in Washington are questioning is Islamabad a reliable ally?

Will U.S. ever trust Pakistan for its war against terrorism and al-Qaeda?

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Sunday called back foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar from the U.S. amid strained ties with Washington following an accusation that Pakistan was supporting the Haqqani terror network.

The gradually warming Pakistan-U.S. ties have suddenly turned sour in the aftermath of the September 13 brazen terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, which senior American military and government officials have squarely blamed on the North Waziristan-based Haqqani militant network, led by Sirajuddin Haqqani.

U.S. military commanders have accused Pakistan’s spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, of supporting the Haqqani network for carrying out two attacks on the U.S. embassy in Kabul and U.S. military base in Afghanistan’s Wadak province this month.

This has prompted U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to warn that the U.S. could do everything it could to defend American forces from the Pakistan-based Haqqani militants staging attacks in Afghanistan, including operations inside Pakistan.

Panetta’s warning was followed by Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani’s decision to cancel his planned trip to the United States that was scheduled for September 16.
The killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces on Pakistani soil, paved way to the tensions between the two nations. It is a relationship that for years has been marred by mistrust.

America has been the blessing in disguise for Pakistan with their innumerable aid for Pakistan. The alliance between the two countries began in 2001, a joint effort to fight against terrorism namely al-Qaeda and Taliban until recently, Pakistan offered support for U.S. drone strikes in tribal areas targeting al- Qaeda and Taliban leaders which became massively unpopular among the Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, leader of the opposition in National Assembly, said that the present war on terror Pakistan was a result of U.S. using Pakistan in the most abominable manner and weakened it to the extent that almost all institutions are facing crises.

He further says Pakistan’s pro-U.S. policies have destroyed the economy, the living, and peace. “It will not be far from truth to say that America has incapacitated us by injecting the sweet poison of aid.”

Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan

There has been disquiet about Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan for several years now. After the attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul in 2008, Washington had pointed to ISI complicity in the incident. But American unhappiness with Pakistan has never been so directly expressed as now.

Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar went a step further and warned the US that if such allegations continue, it “will lose an ally”. And Interior Minister Rehman Malik specifically warned the US against taking any unilateral action against the Haqqanis in Pakistani territory. Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani remarked last week, the U.S. needed Pakistan in Afghanistan, observing that the Americans “can’t live with us. They can’t live without us.”

China Vows to Stand by Pakistan


Chinese Vice Premier Meng Jianzhu Tuesday told Pakistan that Beijing will keep on supporting Islamabad and the cooperation to eliminate terrorism will continue. The assurance comes amidst deteriorating ties between Pakistan and the US.

US officials have accused Pakistan and its spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, of supporting Al Qaeda-linked Haqqani network. Pakistan has denied the accusations.

China Vows to Stand by Pakistan

Meng Jianzhu Tuesday met Interior Minister Rehman Malik, discussing a host of bilateral issues, including war against terror.

Both leaders discussed matters pertaining to mutual interests and the emerging geo-strategic situation of the region, reported Online news agency.

The Chinese vice premier arrived here Monday on a two-day official visit to hold talks with the Pakistani leadership.

The visit by the Chinese leader, who holds the public security portfolio, comes at a time of intense strain between Islamabad and Washington with the US pressurising Pakistan to launch an offensive against suspected militant elements in North Waziristan tribal agency.

Meng told journalists that China stands firm with Pakistan in bad and good times.

He reaffirmed China’s continuing support to Pakistan in its fight against militancy and promotion of regional peace and stability.

Rehman Malik thanked China for its support to Pakistan on all issues of major concern to the country and its people.

Malik said that China’s enemy is Pakistan’s enemy.

10 Osama Bin Laden Facts (Bin Laden Is Dead)


All of you must be aware with the name of the most wanted person ever in the world’s history Osama Bin Laden, so here we have a post about the top 10 facts you didn’t know about Osama Bin Laden. Osama Bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the man was responsible for the 9/11 attacks on the US, as the founder of the jihadist terrorist organization al-Qaeda, he seemed to be in the spotlights for so long. He was responsible for the 1998 US embassy bombings, War in Afghanistan and in North-West Pakistan. Obama declared the death of Osama bin Laden on 1st May, 2011 in Abottabad, Pakistan. The body is in US Custody, so people let me go on with today’s post

Osama Bin Laden Dead 10 Osama Bin Laden Facts  (Bin Laden Is Dead)
See Also: Changes In The World After Osama Bin Laden

1.The US President Obama, declared bin ladens death on 1st May, 2011. But mostly reporters and experts say that he has been with the US custody for more than a week and all they wanted was to check the DNA reports and after the clearing, he is declared dead by the US President.

 

2.Osama bin Laden used his family fortune to setup training camps in Afghanistan , which was later used as a base from which attacks were planned

 

3.One of the major things that Osama said that he left Sudan just to spare the government and his family. But actually in 1996 he was actually expelled from Sudan due to certain incidents.

 

4.United States considered him to be the responsible person of the death of millions of people around the world.

 

5.In the last year 2010, it was announced by the NATO officials that Osama is hiding in Pakistan, but Pakistani government took this as a threat against Pakistan.

6.After the 9/11 attack he became the most wanted person of the world

 

7.In 1991 he was no more a Saudi citizen as he was doing stuff against the government. He helped the veterans of the Afghan war and those people fought in Bosnia, Chechnya and Somalia.

 

8.From 1979 he started working for Jihad and setup many schools for Afghan people. He started an organization who recruited Islamic soldiers. In the mean time in 1989 there formed the most fundamentalist group of Afghanistan called Taliban and it captured the whole Afghanistan.

 

9.His father was known by the name Mohammad Bin Laden, but it isn’t family name and all of his fifty children adopted that name

 

10.Osama Bin Laden was born in a billionaire family, his father had a lot of wives and he was a father of 50 children and Osama was the 17th son.

10 Possible Changes In The World After The Death Of Osama Bin Laden


Is it really a full stop to 10 year of unremitting manhunt of Osama bin Laden? What is the possible reaction of different elements of the world on this? Will the world be able to live in peace now? Does the death of Al-Qaeda leader mark an end to all the fiasco which is occurring in the world currently?. These are the possible questions which I am sure will be roaming about in every one’s mind now. Osama was killed as a repercussion of a successful joint-operation of Pakistan and USA in Abbottabad. It was no doubt a result of effective and pragmatic intelligence information that enabled this long sought target to be killed. Barrack Obama has officially confirmed the news and different leaders from world over have also commented on this. They term this a success of the Allied forces and praised their remarkable performance.
Guys, this event just came out of blue for everyone and God knows what awaits for this world at the far end corner of the tunnel. But I would like to tell you some possible implications of this scenario.

osama is dead 10 Possible Changes In The World After The Death Of Osama Bin Laden

10. CHANGE OF PLANS

Tehrik-e-Taliban spokesman said that their primary target has changed now from USA to Pakistan. To be precise, they said that the Pakistan army, President Asif Ali Zardari and other key personnel are their main target now. Was this the outcome Pakistan was looking for?

9. WASHINGTON AND ISLAMABAD

USA has been claiming repeatedly that Osama bin Laden is somewhere in Pakistan but the Pakistani officialdom has denied this fact. Ah! It was a city of Pakistani where the Al-Qaeda leader has been killed recently. What do you have to tell now Mr.Zardari ? This will obviously affect the already vitiating Pak-US relation and will it be a positive impact or negative is yet to be seen.

8. WORLD STOCK MARKET

It has been a long time since the world stock markets have taken a nosedive and the situation is constantly declining. Many analysts attribute this plummeting situation to the overall terrorism which has covered the globe like a thick cloud. But now that the symbol of terrorism is no more in existence, stock market will show a very positive trend and will gain investor’s confidence to a much greater extent. It is time to see the green upward arrows against each stock! Do you have any?

7. THE UPCOMING ELECTIONS

This event has proved to be a double treat for the American President Obama as it is going to uphold his image in the upcoming elections in front of the public. It is a investment of Obama in the 2012 elections and has earned a great popularity for Barrack Obama. Congratulations Mr.Obama and keep up the good job!

6. DRONE STRIKES

No clear view can be established regarding this issue as it is still very debatable and ambiguous issue for both Pakistan and USA. Pakistan claims that it is against the sovereignty of the country to allow the USA drone attacks to infiltrate the Pakistan border and bombard a area without any restrictions. On the other hand, USA may now claim that it is due to these drone strikes that Bin laden has been identified and ultimately killed in an operation. The drone strikes have fuelled many anti-American sentiments in the general public of Pakistan. Let us see which direction it takes

5. A BIG QUESTION MARK FOR JIHADIS

What are they going to do now when their so revered and effective leader is no longer alive and in between them to guide them? Do they need to hold on for some time or they should continue with their activities and immediately choose a new leader for themselves? Let us leave this to be decided by they themselves.

4. IS IT JUST THE TRIBAL REGION OR SOMETHING MORE…?

Yes guys, USA has a strong argument to start operations within the country because as they found and killed the Al-Qaeda leader Bin laden in Abbottabad, a city of Pakistan, then there must be some other important figures somewhere inside the country. What is ISI going to do now? What should be the policy towards America should be now?

3. TIME TO GO HOME FINALLY!

I think it is a valid justification for the American troops to exit Afghanistan and mark this historic event as the end of the long lasted war in Afghanistan. Now Obama should be considering about the exit strategy seriously and they are now victorious warriors and not any exhaustive group of troops who have left the battlefield in the middle of nothing. The national heroes must be planning to meet their loved ones back at their country. It is party time!

2. FUTURE OF PAKISTAN

What can be possibly predicted about this? This can have either effect on the terrorist groups. It can be that their main leader has lost his life in a very abrupt situation and they have lost their morale and motivation to plan any further terrorist activities or it can be that they are blood-thirsty now and want revenge of their leader, But from WHOM? Is it USA or if I am not wrong is it Pakistan? Are the people of Pakistan safer or have been plunged into more danger?

1. Is Al-Awlaki the next Bin Laden?

It is a wakeup call for the world. This time it is Al-Awlaki who is fomenting the air of terror and intends to be the replacement of Bin laden. He has the ability to plan on various terrorist attacks and is a new emerging threat to the Allied forces. Do we have any strategy for this man? If not, then we should think fast because we may be running out of time before any big attack from their side. May be a life of some innocent is in danger…