Kerry in China to Seek Help in Korea Crisis


Secretary of State John Kerry flew to China on Saturday and sought to elicit China’s help in dealing with an increasingly recalcitrant nuclear armed North Korea by saying that American missile defenses could be cut back if the North abandoned its nuclear program.

diplo-popup

Mr. Kerry’s trip to China, his first since taking office, is part of an intensive three-day push to try to calm tensions on the Korean Peninsula that have threatened to spiral out of control and rattled world leaders.

In a news conference, Mr. Kerry suggested that the United States could remove some newly enhanced missile defenses in the region, though he did not specify which ones. Any eventual cutback would address Chinese concerns about the buildup of American weapons systems in the region.

After back-to-back meetings between Mr. Kerry and China’s top leaders, the two countries announced that they endorsed the principle of ridding the Korean Peninsula of nuclear weapons, though China did not state publicly what steps it might take to achieve that goal after years of reluctance to crack down on Pyongyang.

“We also joined together in calling on North Korea to refrain from provocations and to abide by international obligations,” Mr. Kerry said.

Worries spiked last week as the South Koreans predicted the North could launch a new missile test any day and after the disclosure that an American intelligence agency concluded for the first time with “moderate confidence” that North Korea learned how to make a nuclear warhead small enough to be delivered by a ballistic missile. The administration has since said that it was premature to conclude that Pyongyang had a fully tested weapons system.

Mr. Kerry’s stance on newly fortified missile defenses appeared to be a selling point to get China, the only country presumed to have any real influence over North Korea, to do what it has long resisted — crack down hard enough that North Korea’s leaders will give up an increasingly sophisticated nuclear program.

In recent weeks, the administration has dispatched two ships outfitted with Aegis antimissile defenses to the region and said it will speed up the positioning of land-based missile defenses on Guam to protect allies in the region after North Korea’s threats to rain missiles on United States troops there and on South Korea.

Many Chinese believe the antimissile systems are part of a containment strategy against them at a time when the United States is pursuing a “pivot” to Asia.

In the past, China has been motivated by a different fear: that any move to destabilize the North would lead to a collapse of the regime and deliver the entire peninsula to the United States’ sphere of influence, possibly bringing American troops in South Korea closer to its border.

China’s cooperation is essential to the Obama administration’s strategy of holding a tough line on Pyongyang in an attempt to achieve the type of long-lasting solution on the nuclear program that has eluded a string of United States presidents. Previous administrations responded to North Korean provocations by eventually offering aid to tamp down tensions, only to see the North’s promises to relinquish its nuclear program evaporate once the aid had been delivered.

Mr. Kerry said he explained to China why the United States felt it needed more missile defenses in the region.

“Obviously if the threat disappears — i.e. North Korea denuclearizes — the same imperative does not exist at that point of time for us to have that kind of robust forward leaning posture of defense,” he said. “And it would be our hope in the long run, or better yet in short run, that we can address that.”

Mr. Kerry’s remarks are likely to stir concern among staunch advocates of missile defense in the United States, who also see antimissile systems as a means of responding to China’s growing military might. His aides say any changes would require the input of the Pentagon.

Even if China were to take a strong position with its longtime ally, possibly cutting back essential aid and fuel, North Korea might not fall into line. Under its new leader, Kim Jong-un, the North has snubbed China several times, including refusing Chinese entreaties to cancel the recent nuclear test that set off the war of words on the Peninsula.

At the core of the issue is the United States’ inability to draw North Korea into a serious round of nuclear talks. North Korea’s apparent determination to expand its nuclear weapons program and the American demand that it commit up front to eventually relinquishing those arms have raised the question of whether there is even any basis for negotiations. “China has an enormous ability to help make a difference here,” Mr. Kerry said on Friday in Seoul.

The Chinese stance on North Korea has never been a simple one. On one hand, the Chinese prize stability and are eager to avoid a crisis that would spawn a flood of refugees or prompt the United States to shift more forces to the Pacific. On the other hand, that same concern for stability has meant that it is reluctant to take steps that would undermine the North Korean government’s hold on power and eliminate a friendly buffer between Chinese territory and South Korean and American forces.

In Beijing, Mr. Kerry met with the new president, Xi Jinping, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Premier Li Keqiang and State Councilor Yang Jiechi.

Mr. Yang said at a dinner with Mr. Kerry on Saturday night that China was committed to “the denuclearization process on the Korean Peninsula.” But the Chinese state councilor also stressed that the “issue should be handled and resolved peacefully through dialogue and consultation.”

To encourage the Chinese to deal with the North Korean nuclear problem, Mr. Kerry said that he had shared “very in-depth” information illustrating the danger of how a nuclear North Korea could promote the proliferation of nuclear arms in Asia and the Middle East.

Mr. Kerry said his aim was to find a way to revive the goals of the six-party talks on the North’s nuclear program, which have been stalled since 2009 when North Korea withdrew. The talks have included North and South Korea, China, Russia, Japan and the United States.

He also portrayed cooperation on North Korea as just one element of a “model partnership” the United States hoped to build with China on diplomatic, economic and environmental issues.

Mr. Kerry said there would be additional discussions in the weeks ahead with the Chinese that would involve American intelligence experts including Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The two sides also called on North Korea to refrain from provocations, an apparent allusion to a potential missile test the South Koreans said could happen soon.

Bonnie S. Glaser, a senior adviser for Asia at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said China was very frustrated with Mr. Kim and was taking some action, like cracking down on the flow of illicit North Korean funds through Chinese banks. At the same time, she noted, the Chinese fear the United States’ recent actions, including a test flight of B-2 bombers over South Korea, would further incite the North.

The United States “keeps sending more fighter bombers and missile defense ships to the waters of East Asia and carrying out massive military drills with Asian allies in a dramatic display of pre-emptive power,” the state-run news agency Xinhua said Saturday.

 Jane Perlez contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 13, 2013

 An earlier version of this article misidentified the Chinese official who stressed that “the denuclearization process on the Korean Peninsula” should be “handled and resolved peacefully through dialogue and consultation.” It was State Councilor Yang Jiechi, not Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

By MICHAEL R. GORDON

Samsung YOUM Flexible Display 2013 Samsung Galaxy S4


Consumer Electronic Show which is annually held showcases some of the best technology that will be unveiled for that specific year. This year, 2013, was no different. Companies from around the world revealed their finest products. There was one particularly company that caught many people’s attention and that was Samsung.Samsung unveiled world’s first flexible display smartphones for 2013 dubbed as YOUM.

Samsung YOUM Flexible Display 2013

Samsung is currently the world’s number one smartphone company in terms of number of devices sold. And, it is on its way to become the number one tech company if it unveils this new technology called YOUM.
The South Korean Company, Samsung has been improvising on this new flexible technology over the past couple of years. We got to look at this new flexible display screen technology back in 2011 and since than Samsung has greatly improved.
YOUM made its first formal appearance in CES 2013 when Samsung unveiled the first prototypes featuring these bendable screens. One of these prototypes showed a paper thin screen which an executive of Samsung bent multiple times to “wow” the audience. It was followed by another prototype which was bent on the sides to reveal messages without even opening the cover.
You can check out the video regarding Samsung’s YOUM flexible display technology revealed at CES 2013 below.
 
 
Isn’t that just amazing?
Now you would be wondering that this is just a concept and we won’t these flexible displays for another year or two. Well folks to get your adrenaline levels up, Samsung might just unveil this YOUM technology in the up coming Samsung Galaxy S4! That is the next generation smartphone from Samsung which will be released within a couple of months! But again, we can’t be sure until confirmed by the Korean company itself.
These flexible displays feature OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode), which not only gives a more sharp image compared to LED but also helps in improving the battery life of the device.
Although there is no confirmed word on the release of such flexible display products but there is a high chance they will be launched in 2013.

World #Nuclear Electricity Generation Down 5 Percent Since 2006


World nuclear electricity-generating capacity has been essentially flat since 2007 and is likely to fall as plants retire faster than new ones are built. In fact, the actual electricity generated at nuclear power plants fell 5 percent between 2006 and 2011.

In 2011, following Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, 13 nuclear reactors in Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom were permanently taken offline. Seven new reactors, three of them in China, were connected to the grid. The net result was a two percent reduction in world nuclear capacity to 369,000 megawatts by the end of 2011. In 2012, the world has added a net 3,000 megawatts of nuclear capacity, with new additions in South Korea and Canada partly offset by more U.K. shutdowns.


© Earth Policy Institute

The United States, with 104 nuclear reactors generating some 19 percent of the country’s electricity, leads the world in nuclear generating capacity. France is a distant second in installed capacity, but its 58 reactors meet more than three quarters of the country’s electricity demand. (President François Hollande has pledged to reduce this dependence to 50 percent by 2025.)


© Earth Policy Institute

China, Russia, South Korea, and India account for 48 of the 64 nuclear reactors the International Atomic Energy Agency lists as under construction worldwide. Although these 64 reactors add up to some 62,000 megawatts of potential new capacity, fewer than one in four has a projected date for connecting to the electrical grid. Some reactors have been listed as “under construction” for over two decades.


© Earth Policy Institute

Plagued by cost overruns, construction delays, and a dearth of private investment interest, the world’s nuclear reactor fleet is aging quickly as new reactor connections struggle to keep up with retirements. The average age of nuclear reactors operating today is 27 years; the 142 reactors that have already retired were just 23 years old on average when they closed. Many nuclear reactors have been granted operating extensions, usually for 20 years, beyond their typical design lifetime of 40 years. But since Fukushima, where the four retired reactors averaged 37 years in operation, this option has become less attractive.


© Earth Policy Institute

In contrast to the decline in nuclear power, electricity generation from the wind and the sun has grown 27 percent and 62 percent, respectively, per year since 2006. Four German states now get close to half of their electricity from wind. By 2015, China plans to increase its current estimated 60,000 megawatts of grid-connected wind power capacity to 100,000 megawatts. More solar photovoltaic capacity was added in the European Union in 2011 than any other source of electricity generation. The list of exciting developments in renewable energy goes on. As this story unfolds, it is becoming increasingly clear that we can design an energy economy that is at once low-carbon and low-risk.

By J. Matthew Roney

 

Circumventing sanctions: Iran begins construction of $10bn gas pipeline to Syria


Iran has begun building a US$10 billion gas pipeline to Syria as part of efforts to boost its energy sector, as well as help its war-torn neighbor. Tehran has also been battling Western sanctions ever since it refused to abandon its nuclear program.

­According to a report by Fars news agency, Iran has begun construction of the first phase of the project. It involves a 225km (140 mile) stretch and will cost approximately $3 billion. The 1,500km (750 mile) pipeline will pass through Iraq before reaching Syria.

The entire project is to be completed in the second half of 2013. The deal was signed between Iran, Iraq and Syria last July, Fars said.

The pipeline would help boost Iran’s gas output, which the country hopes will exceed Qatar’s by 2016.

Iran has the world’s second-largest gas reserves, estimated at 28 trillion cubic meters.

Meanwhile, after a seven month decline due to Western sanctions, Iran’s oil output has made a recovery. The sanctions also initially hurt exports. However, China’s and South Korea’s increased purchases have seen an export recovery recently.

Syria’s stability is vital to Iran, with the Persian state giving its beleaguered neighbor unwavering support since the beginning of the civil unrest.

It warned against sending weapons to Syrian rebels, saying it will threaten regional stability and increase the “risk of terrorism.”

Iran’s foreign minister said in a speech on Sunday that talks between Syrian officials and opposition groups that “some countries envisage arming the opposition with heavy and semi-heavy weaponry.”

Tehran has also hosted a conference under the motto, “No to violence, yes to democracy” in a bid to end the violence in Syria. An estimated 200 Syrian and regional politicians gathered in Iran’s capital on Sunday to discuss possible solutions.

“We believe reforms in Syria should lead to a free, fair and transparent election with the cooperation of all political parties,” Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said in opening remarks at the one-day Syrian National Dialogue conference.

Iran continues to back Syrian President Bashar Assad and his regime, despite the continued bloodshed.

The presence of delegations from dozens of countries, including representatives of Russia and China, two of Syria’s key allies, has shown that Iran may well be able to influence the conflict, notwithstanding crippling Western sanctions and international condemnation.

Carmakers deploy more robots as job loss fears gain ground


hree hundred robots whirr to life every morning all over Hyundai‘s Sriperumbudur plant near Chennai, rubbing shoulders with 1,500 employees and 7,000 contract workers. Together, man and machine churn out one car in less than a minute; over 600,000 cars roll out of the factory every year. The number of robots inhabiting the factory has increased more than 10-fold in a decade.

This alliance between man and machine is an uneasy one even as automotive companies from Chennai to Chakan, Gurgaon to Sanand, slowly deploy more robots. Honda Siel, in its journey from 30,000 cars a year to 120,000, has almost tripled automation levels – from 20% to 55%. Maruti Suzuki‘s Manesar plant is highly automated compared with its older Gurgaon facility. Ford India deployed 90 robots to meet high demand for its small car Figo.

There is no full-blown man-machine confrontation yet, only a gnawing fear among 200,000 employees at auto factories across the country. “Automation is also one of the points of differences with the management,” says A Soundararajan, general secretary of trade union Citu, who has fought many a battle with Hyundai India’s management in recent years. “Automation will result in job losses and retrenchment.”

Car companies directly or indirectly employ over five workers for every car produced. All automobile and component companies together employ over 1.3 crore workers directly and indirectly.

Many companies – and Hyundai is a good example of that – are taking care to preserve and progress human workers. Still, growing automation is forcing the latter to engage with existential questions about their future.

“Our greatest fear is when large number of workers are substituted by machines,” says Harjeet Grover, union leader at Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India.

Kuldeep, who leads the union at Sona Koyo Steering, a major supplier to Maruti Suzuki, gives an example. Fifteen machines would have needed 15 operators a few years ago, he points out. Now, one man can run 10 machines.

At Hyundai, gone are the part-bypart way of putting together a car; today, 40% of the value of the car comes to Hyundai by way of pre-arranged modules, de-skilling the job at the shop floor.

COMPONENT MAKERS DOING IT TOO
Yet, against the backdrop of these robots, sourced from sister company Hyundai Heavy Industries, Hyundai employees aren’t letting things drift in favour of their inanimate factory mates. They have been working hard on improvements. These range from tools to detect the welding quality to an energy saver system that switches off power automatically during the breaks.

All this is part of a focussed programme called ACT 302, wherein workers have been urged to suggest ways to improve productivity by 30% in two years (that’s why the number 302).

Hyundai has never had to do such a focussed programme to get workers to ideate and collaborate until now; not even in its global mother plant at Ulsan, South Korea. The fact that India’s No. 2 carmaker decided to break tradition had largely to do with how workers were reacting to automation all around them.

As T Sarangarajan, Vice President in charge of production, puts it, the workers were getting panicky. There was a need to engage them, he says. Thus, ACT 302. “We have to make use of BOB ( best of both),” says Rajan Wadhera, chief of technology, product development and sourcing, Mahindra & Mahindra.

It’s not just carmakers, even component vendors are automating factories. The level of automation in Apollo Tyres’ brand-new Chennai plant is the highest among all its plants. “Our Chennai unit was built with automation as an intrinsic part of its operations and, therefore, it is part of the plant culture,” says Satish Sharma, chief (India operations).

“Automating may seem more expensive in terms of initial investment, but the advantages outweigh the capital costs over a short period of time.” Apollo has already set in motion an automation deployment plan for all its four India facilities.

For Indian firms, the first steps are always through the low-hanging fruit of automation – found in three areas. One, areas that require extremely high precision. Two, where hazard levels are high. Three, where human fatigue can be a factor. That should actually gladden workers at the shop floor. It has, in some measure.

But it has also spooked them. That’s because there is a likely future for automation beyond the low-hanging fruit. Already, work done by a group of workers earlier is now managed easily by a robot. Also, to be in the game, workers would need more advanced skills.

THE RE-SKILL MANTRA
The Indian auto shop floor isn’t as automated as those in the more mature markets. So, while German carmaker Volkswagen’s Chakan plant has an automation of 30% in its body shop, the comparative number back home would be 90%.

In the West, the biggest leap in automation happened “in the welding shop where robots were introduced to practically all welding by the 1980s”, says Cambridge-based lean expert James Womack, who predicted Toyota’s ascent in the auto world way back in the early 1980s in The Machine That Changed the World. Then, the paint shop was fully automated.

“The remaining area is the final assembly of the car. Here automation has progressed only very slowly,” Womack says. In low-wage countries like India, the question Womack asks is whether rising wages and rising production volumes will lead to the levels of automation as in mature economies. “And the answer is yes.” Yet, he reckons, Indian workers can breathe easy for now. That’s because volume growth will more than make up for the increasing automation levels.

India’s car output, Crisil Research predicts, is set to double from current levels to about 4 million units by 2015-16. Labour does remain an alluring option, despite recent problems. That’s why, Abdul Majeed, auto practice leader, PricewaterhouseCoopers, reckons, “The growth of automation will be slow in India.” This is despite robots enabling efficiency improvement between 25% and 30%, he says.

M&M’s Wadhera gives more reasons as to “why the decision to go for robotic automation is sometimes not easy to make in India.” Enormous shortage of skilled personnel is one. Another is the high cost of maintenance.

Automakers don’t have to make hard choices at this point of time. They can increase automation levels and then redeploy the workforce. The high rate of growth in the industry makes this possible. So, although there is no immediate threat to workers in the Indian shop floor, the demands on them aren’t the same anymore. Their roles are changing.

Says Apollo’s Sharma: “We do not have what has traditionally been referred to as ‘workers’ at the Chennai plant.” Apollo, instead, has shop floor engineers who are not just in charge of running machinery but also its upkeep, maintenance and effecting innovation.Volkswagen India has launched the Mechatronics Apprenticeship Programme, based on the German dual system of vocational training.

This three-year programme seeks to provide modern automation technologies to apprentices. “More automation requires more skilled force,” says John Chacko, president and MD, Volkswagen India.

A Maruti official talks of multi-skilling on the shop floor. Mahindra’s Wadhera emphasises the need to re-skill. Hyundai’s Sarangarajan says there’s a clear career road map from worker to supervisor, the latter role isn’t vulnerable to technological advances.

In a June 2010 analysis, Hyung Je Jo, professor of sociology at the University of Ulsan, ascribed Hyundai’s global success in recent years to, among other things, a production model that has reduced dependence on direct labour but increased automation levels.

SRIRAM SRINIVASAN, SANJAY VIJAYAKUMAR & LIJEE PHILIP

World’s Most Hardworking Nations: India 7th


A new survey conducted by Ipsos Global and Reuters found that Indiaranked as one of the most hardworking countries in the world. The survey says that full-time workers in most countries get paid holidays, apart from Sundays and Saturdays too. Ipsos Global and Reuters survey on 13,000 people across various countries checked the likelihood of employees using all their vacation days, reports rediff Business.

 Here is the list of top 10 hard working nations in the World

Japan

Japan

Japan has been ranked as the most hardworking nation in the world in terms of its full-time workers using their allotted paid holidays. There is only 33 percent of the employees avail of their allotted paid holidays. They get 16 public holidays and work about 1,714 hours per year on an average.

Australia

Australia

Australia comes at number second as only 47 percent Australian workers take all their allotted vacation days. They get 8 federal holidays off, and they work an average of 1,690 hours per year.

South Africa

South Africa

With only 47 percent Australian workers take all their allotted vacation days, they are in third position. Australians get 8 federal holidays off, and they work an average of 1,690 hours per year.

South Korea

South Korea

The people of South Korea get 15 public holidays and only 53 percent of the employees take all their allotted vacation days.

The United States

The United States

In U.S. there are 10 government or public holidays and only 57 percent of people take all their allotted vacation days. Employees in U.S work 1,768 hours per year on an average.

Canada

Canada

In Canada, only 58 per cent of the employed people take all their allotted holidays and they get only 9 federal holidays per year. Canadians work an average of 1,699 hours per year.

India

India

The sincerity and hard-work put in by Indians has enhanced the nation’s visibility on the global map as being the 7th most hardworking country. Indians get 16 government holidays, and employers are required to give only 12 paid holidays. Only 58.5 percent of employees take all their allotted holidays.

Brazil

Brazil

In Brazil, there are 11 federal holidays, and employers are required to offer 30 additional vacation days. But only 59 percent Brazilian employees take all their allotted holidays.

Sweden

Sweden

In Swede, the employees get 11 government holidays in a year, and work about 1,610 hours per year on an average and only 63 percent of people take all their allotted vacation days.

China

China

In China there are 11 government holidays, and any organizations have to give at least 10 vacation days to employees. In China 65 percent of employees take all their allotted vacation days.